From 37481f6efa0f769145b86f446328bc47345a4f97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: lutoff <lutoff@localhost>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 08:00:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] JMX RMI connector registration into an RMi registry doesn't seems to hav the same behavior between Java 5 and Java 6 Adapt the code to work both on Java 5 and Java 6
---
opends/src/server/org/opends/server/protocols/jmx/RmiConnector.java | 17 +----------------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opends/src/server/org/opends/server/protocols/jmx/RmiConnector.java b/opends/src/server/org/opends/server/protocols/jmx/RmiConnector.java
index 4fe039a..f635fb4 100644
--- a/opends/src/server/org/opends/server/protocols/jmx/RmiConnector.java
+++ b/opends/src/server/org/opends/server/protocols/jmx/RmiConnector.java
@@ -27,12 +27,10 @@
package org.opends.server.protocols.jmx;
import java.io.IOException;
-import java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException;
import java.rmi.RemoteException;
import java.rmi.registry.LocateRegistry;
import java.rmi.registry.Registry;
import java.rmi.server.RMISocketFactory;
-import java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject;
import java.util.HashMap;
import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory;
@@ -479,19 +477,6 @@
}
//
- // Stop the RMI registry
- try
- {
- UnicastRemoteObject.unexportObject(registry, true);
- }
- catch (NoSuchObjectException e)
- {
- // TODO Log an error message
- assert debugException(CLASS_NAME, "finalizeConnectionHandler", e);
- }
- registry = null;
-
- //
// Close the socket
try
{
@@ -502,6 +487,6 @@
// TODO Log an error message
assert debugException(CLASS_NAME, "finalizeConnectionHandler", e);
}
-
+ registry = null;
}
}
--
Gitblit v1.10.0